Skip to main content

Intolerant India

PM Narendra Modi believes that India has recorded an enormous change during his tenure. Nothing was so good and convenient before 2014. India was not as important country as it became after 2014. He firmly believes that India has got recognizance after the commencement of the Modi-led BJP government. Previous governments of India has not done anything worth boasting about. Whereas Mr. Modi's every single policy is historical. From Pt. Nehru to Dr. Singh (that includes Mr. Vajpayee too) there's not a single Prime Minister who had contributed even a half of what Mr. Modi has done. 

Everything was going so well and good under the huge shadow of Mr. Modi meanwhile a debate over the topic of INTOLERANCE has risen. Artists of different modes protested against the prevalent communal disturbances in the nation by returning their awards. Aamir Khan entered the debate by expressing himself about the prevailing scenario and made the topic fiery which was certainly unintentional by his side. Intellectuals from BJP argued that whatever Aamir has expressed is all RUBBISH and considered it as a publicity stunt. PUBLICITY STUNT by Aamir Khan? He was the 5th most followed Indian on twitter at that point of time. Does he really need to perform a stunt to have public attention? I am nobody to judge whether Aamir has really done this to have attention or it was just as usual. But logic does not allow me to stand by the statement of Yogi Adityanath. 

News Channels like Zee News had already declared Aamir Khan as anti-nationalist and asked him to move to Pakistan. Zee News should not be considered as a news channel anymore. Today, the relevance of this channel is enormously comprehensive. Zee News is now the apex judicial court of India and Sudhir Chaudhary has no lesser importance than chief justice of India altogether. He has a concrete authority to certified people as nationalist or anti-nationalist. BJP must have damaged many significant institutions of India but at the same time BJP had strengthened some institutions as well. (ex- Zee News, Republic TV, Patanjali, Reliance etc).

Recently, Nasiruddin Shah had spoke his heart out in an interview and shown his disenchantment with the current atmosphere. He had highlighted about growing communal tension in India. Point to pay attention is 'all of these artists have spoken against the unpleasant and unkind communal tension.' No one in these had directly opposed the government. Nasiruddin Shah and Aamir Khan are not just film-stars they're also equal citizens of the country. As an equal citizen of the country, Nasiruddin Shah has equal amount of rights as Mohan Bhagwat does. Therefore, constitution allows him to speak his mind and express his disappointments. Neither Aamir nor Nasir had mentioned the name of BJP still the members of the ruling party have neglected their views and demonstrated their intolerant nature. In this country where the voice of public figures are being suppressed (only if you're anti-modi) then how can a common man raise his voice against out of his discontentment?

Actors like Anupam Kher and Akshay Kumar did not stand by the side of their fellows. They don't feel like this. For them getting Padma Shri and nomination in Swachh Bharat by PM Modi himself is much more important. People like Anupam Kher argues that "India has blessed Mr. Khan and Nasirji so much. The country has given them a lot they should not be like this." Nasiruddin Shah had earned so much in India and this is why he should behave more responsibly and raise such issues which are so genuine and logical unlike those promises made by Mr. Modi. People like Nasiruddin and Aamir Khan do value their country more than anything whereas people like Anupam Kher and Akshay Kumar tend to seek tapping on the back by the Prime Minister.

Restlessness of BJP is so natural. No one other than the BJP is responsible for the current tragic scenario of India. That is only why without being targeted BJP members are feeling victimized by the debate of intolerance which is actually very relevant and surreal these days. BJP has been trying promote enmity on the grounds of religion and those efforts are clearly visible by the atrocities which are taking place. (Ex - Bulandshahr)

In today's India, you can either be a rightist with zero tolerance and zero logic or an anti-nationalist with zero negligence and full of logic. 

PARA-I BELONGS TO NARENDRA MODI'S MINDSET.

-ABHISHEK MISHRA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

गांव और समाज

गावों की चारित्रिक विशेषताओं में से एक इसकी स्वागत करने की प्रवृत्ति है। शहर की भांति यहां पूंजीगत चकाचौंध और हर दिन एक नए उम्मीद को साधने का संघर्ष नहीं। शहर की तुलना में गांव अत्यधिक शांत और मनोरम लगता है। गांव का परिवेश आपको संवारता है और शहर में लोग परिवेश को हर रोज़ नई शक्ल दे रहे हैं। कभी फ्लाईओवर निर्माण, कभी मेट्रो निर्माण, कभी शॉपिंग माल आदि। शहर रुकता नहीं, यह गतिशील है। संघर्षरत है। जबकि गावों में यह गुण गौण हैं। ग्रामीण जीवन तमाम खुलेपन के बावजूद कई बंदिशों से बंधा रहता है। शहर में तंग गलियां, छोटे घर एवं सड़कों का ट्रैफिक भी आपको इतना नहीं बांधता जितना गावों का पिछड़ापन बांधता है। धार्मिक संलङता अवश्य ही ग्रामीण जीवन की एक सच्चाई है परन्तु यह कतई पिछड़ेपन को तो इंगित नहीं करती। मगर धार्मिक आधार पर रचे हुए आडंबर एवं कुरीतियां ज़रूर ग्रामीण समाज के पिछड़ेपन को परिलक्षित करते हैं। गावों के वातावरण एवं प्राकृत सौंदर्य की भांति यह कुरीतियां कतई मनभावन नहीं लगती। हालांकि अब कई घृणास्पद कुरीतियों का अंत हो चुका है, जातिगत विषमताएं भी पिछली सदी जितनी प्रखर नहीं दिखाई पड़ती। जो दुर

Modi & Interviews: A Beautiful Love Story

Narendra Modi as the Prime Minister of India has not faced a single press-conference yet. It hardly makes an impact on his screen-time of media coverage. There's not a single day passed by in last five years when the shows were running out of Modi. India has always been an important country and still it is respected as one. But Prime Ministers weren't always this important. It's not India who got all the glory and significance in these five years but it's the Prime Minister's chair which has suddenly got the enormous importance in these five years. Glory of PM is now greater than that of India. Modi gets credit for every single achievement of India but he does not face any kind of criticism for the failures. Projection of Modi as Mr. Perfect is being done by none other than the fourth pillar of democracy: The Media. Fourth Pillar of the democracy is now extravagantly busy in building the image of PM. After being served by journalists our honorable PM has given

ESCAPISM

Undoubtedly, BJP possesses the largest number of seats in the parliament comparatively. Does it only show the kind of support BJP is having in this era? Does not it show the responsibilities and expectations of one-fifth population of the globe on Mr. Modi's shoulders? The Prime Minister of the largest democracy would certainly have the heaviest burden on his shoulders and he should behave accordingly. Rather than escaping himself through condemnations, denunciations and disagreements. Disagreements in the democracy is as obvious as death in the life.  A democracy like India which has the population over a billion, one should not get surprised on disagreements on every possible issue & policy. In a democracy it is already expected that there will be differences in opinions and interests on almost every specific issue of common interest. Indeed, this diversity is seen as its main strength and it calls for tolerance for all shades of opinion. One can not even imagine